Current subscribers can click on the header above to log in, if
desired. The link to renew a subscription
or to check when it expires is near the bottom of this page.
The Reid Reviews article index gives a listing of stories published to date.
For suggestions about how to get the most out of the site see our site tips.
Reviews' normal business hours are 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Monday through
(excluding holidays) and any problems with subscriptions, responses to e-mail, etc. are normally handled
during those business hours. I am, however, sometimes away photographing during those hours and
appreciate your patience if you need to wait for a response to your e-mail. If subscribing, please be sure that the
full name you provide exactly matches the name on your PayPal account.
On May 15 I published a review of the Sony Distagon T FE 35/1.4 based on field and studio testing.
On May 2 I published an article about working with the Leica Monochrom (Typ 246) at Daytona Beach.
On April 17 I published a review of the Zeiss Loxia 25/2.4 Distagon based on field and studio testing.
On April 10 I published a review of the Sony A7R III.
On March 21 I published a review of the Cosina Voigtlander 15/4.5 Super Wide-Heliar ASPH III on the
Leica CL based upon extensive field testing and studio tests of resolution, vignetting and color drift.
On March 8 I published a review of the Cosina Voigtlander 10/5.6 Heliar-Hyper Wide on the Leica CL
based on field testing and studio tests of resolution, vignetting and color drift.
On February 21 I published a very extensive double lens review of the Leica 75/1.25 Noctilux ASPH
& Leica 75/2.0 APO Summicron ASPH based on field and full studio testing. This article includes
over 200 illustrations.
On February 15 I published a detailed double lens review of the Fuji XF 80/2.8 Macro and Fuji
XF 90/2.0 based on field and studio testing. This article includes over 140 illustrations and is
probably the most extensive Fuji lens review I have done to date.
On January 27 I published an article which looks at detailed studio tests (using three different compact
rangefinder lenses) that compare the corner-to-corner resolution, vignetting and color drift of the
Leica M10 and M (Typ 240). This is an article I've long wanted to do and it hopefully should prove
interesting to any photographers who work with the full frame Leica DRFs.
On January 20 I published an extensive review of the Cosina Voigtlander 10/5.6 Heliar-Hyper Wide
on the Leica M10.
On January 11 I published a studio comparison test that looks at the color rendering, resolution and ISO
noise performance of the Fuji X-Pro 2 and Leica CL.
On December 7 I revised and expanded my 2015 article on the, fairly important, topic of "Software
Distortion Correction". This subject is becoming increasingly relevant as forced SDC becomes more and
more common in opcodes and raw file processing. Like AA filtering, SDC comes with pros and cons.
On December 6 I published a full review of the Leica TL 35/1.4 Summilux ASPH tested (in the studio
and in the field) on the Leica CL.
On November 28 I published the results of my field and studio testing of the Leica 28/2.8 M Elmarit ASPH
on the Leica CL.
On November 21 I published a review of the new Leica CL.
On November 21 I published a full review of the new Leica TL 18/2.8 Elmarit ASPH.
On November 13 I published an extensive review of the Cosina Voigtlander 12/5.6 Ultra Wide-Heliar III
on the Leica M10 and Sony A9.
On November 6 I published a field and studio test of the Leitz Wetzlar 28/2.8 R Elmarit on the Sony A9.
On October 26 I published an article that looks at the comparative highlight headroom
(available for over-exposure) in DNGs made by the Leica SL, M10 and M (Typ 240).
On October 20 I published an extensive review of the Cosina Voigtlander 15/4.5 Super Wide Heliar III
on the Leica M10 and Sony A9.
On September 29 I published a review of the Sony A9. There are quite a few other articles in progress now
that will be coming out in October and November.
On August 24 I published an article that looks at the usable dynamic range (UDR) differences between two
cameras (tested at three different ISO levels). The cameras tested were the Leica M10 and Leica M (Typ 240)
but the general ideas explored in the article apply to almost all digital cameras.
On August 4 I published a full review of the Fujinon XF 16/1.4 R WR based on field and studio testing.
22 I published an article that looks at the
highlight headroom available, at different low ISO levels, from
three Leica cameras: the M10, SL and M (Typ 240). The larger subject this story looks at, naturally, is native ISO
and its relation to dynamic range. So the ideas explored in this article may also be of interest to photographers
who work with other brands of cameras.
On July 2 I published a test of four different programs for converting FujiFilm RAF files.
12 I updated my review of the Sigma SD Quattro H based
on field testing using an external Elvid
6 I published an extensive review of the
BenQ SW320 which is a 4K display that renders in nearly full
AdobeRGB. This article also looks in detail at calibration as well as options for using 4K displays with older
(silver box) Mac Pros.
On May 25 I published a full review of the Fujinon XF 50/2.0 WR based on field and studio testing.
11 I published my review of the Sigma SD
Quattro H. This camera is especially interesting not only
because it uses a larger sensor than past Sigma Foveon cameras but also because it can now output DNG files.
11 I updated my article on waist level
photography with some new comments about Diane
On April 26 I published my review of the Fuji X-T2.
13 I published an article that began as a
field report but -- organically I think -- grew into an essay,
an interview (with the photographer Larry Fink), a field report (on working at waist level with the Fuji X-T1)
and a proposal for a new digital camera.
Every writer naturally brings his or her
own experience and perspective to the articles he or she
writes. My writing is heavily influenced by my experience
working as a professional photographer for more than thirty
years. I'm primarily interested in cameras and lenses as
tools for drawing, as I believe that photography really is a branch of
drawing. As the photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson once said in
an interview, "My photography is
just an instant drawing...I never quit drawing. The camera is a way of
I'm also guided by the photographer Andre Kertesz's observation, "I see the thing, I feel the thing, I make the thing". So when I review a camera or a lens, I look primarily at how it presents the world to the photographer (via the finder), how it works as a tool in the hands, and how it draws the kind of picture we call a photograph.
"Quite simply, I think your sections on 'drawing' and and on 'sunny day lenses' are the best writing about photographic lenses that I have read - whether in magazines, journals, books or the various sources online. Few professional writers about photography ever attempt such a full consideration of the range of lens performance characteristics and the different ways in which they are photographically significant. Some discussions in photographic communities online circle around the subject, but don't achieve the focus, rigour and articulacy that you have managed here. Your article is what all writing about photographic lenses ought to be like, yet it's astonishing that next to none of it is. Interesting though Irwin Puts Leica lens book is, it would have been so much more interesting, and so much more appropriate to its subject matter, if it had been written as you have written here...I found the article incredibly useful and interesting. A great help in clarifying and firming up what I have experienced and half-understood about how different lenses work."
- Simon Pulman-Jones,
"We all owe you a vote of thanks for such a massive and thorough piece of work. What a concept-- a "lens test" that is really about the pictorial effect of how lenses draw their images. Lines per millimeter and MTF graphs have their place, but your article really gets to the heart of the matter in the way that photographers can relate to instantly."
- Peter Klein, USA
- Jim Watts, USA
- Mikiro Mori, Japan
"...a very informative, even enlightening, work. It not only provides visual evidence of comparative lenses' performance, it also gets right to the most important factor of lens evaluation - how the image looks to the photographer. Long ago I stopped reading test charts of lenses since none of my clients ever published any. It is always the look of the finished image that counts."
- Richard Weisgrau, USA
"I hope your tests become a benchmark for other reviewers to pay more attention to the real needs of photographers..."
- Phil Fogle, USA
- Bill Marshall, USA
ReidReviews.com accepts no advertising. A subscription is currently $39.95 per year. To get a sense of my writing style and approach you may want to read any of the freely accessible articles linked in the Read Without A Subscription section of our article index. And, of course, that index includes every article on RR so you'll be able to see just what content can be found here. As of late November, 2017 there were over 450 articles on the site, most of them quite extensive. All of them are reviews or essays.
A list of current articles on Reid
Reviews can be found at the site's article
Policy On Advertising
many readers know, RR has always been an independent site in many
that word. We hope that our readers can appreciate the value of this
approach. As a society, we are barraged with advertising (on the web,
on televison, on radio, on buses, streets, etc.). Reading Reid Reviews
is, we hope, an oasis from that. We have never accepted advertising and
we never will. We also have never taken sales commission from any
business. The Reid Reviews system is simple: we create the content and
our readers, and only our readers, pay for it.
For a humorous, but also very perceptive, take on where the line between journalism and advertising seems to be heading, for some publications at least, see this John Oliver video. I highly recommend watching it.
Article Viewer Options
The new site offers six ways to view Reid Reviews content. Click the image below to read about these.
on either image below to get a sense of what our main HTML 5 pages look
like on a 1920 by 1200 pixel monitor. Our mobile viewers are simplified
and more compact. The grey dots you see on each page are clicked to
open or close the side panels (an article list panel on the left and a
search panel on the right).
Useful tips on using the Reid Reviews site can be found here. That page is worth reading and will be updated from time to time.
The one-year subscription rate for the site is $39.95. Once your username and password have been issued, the subscription amount is not refundable. The best way to sample my work (to decide if you'd want to be a subscriber) is to read the freely accessible articles linked in the Read Without A Subscription section of our article index. Pay Pal customers can pay for their subscriptions using their Pay Pal accounts and people who are not Pay Pal customers may make a one-time credit card payment to Reid Reviews via PayPal. To make a payment by check please follow the instructions listed on the "subscribe" page which is linked below.
Reviews' normal business hours are 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Monday through
Friday (excluding holidays) and any problems with subscriptions,
responses to e-mail, etc. are normally handled during those business
hours. I am, however, sometimes away for medical appointments during
those hours and appreciate your patience if you need to wait for a
response to your e-mail. If subscribing, please be sure that the full name you
provide exactly matches the name on your PayPal account. If they
don't match there's a good chance the system will not be able to start
your subscription automatically.
Reid Reviews is a high-bandwidth site full of high quality JPEGs that, intentionally, are saved with minimal compression so each picture file is quite large (given its dimensions). Preserving the thoroughness and technical picture quality of the reviews requires that the included JPEGs be only lightly compressed.
When you choose your user name and password *please* record them in a safe place for future reference. If you misplace your user name or password please click on the "Log In" link and follow the instructions there.
Paypal should automatically confirm your
payment so that your subscription begins immediately. Due to the
mysteries of PayPal, however, this sometimes does not happen for a
small percentage of new subscriptions. The most common reason for
Paypal subscription problems is entering a subscription account name
that does not exactly match the name one provides to PayPal. If
you've made a subscription payment but do not yet have access to the
site, please contact us to manually confirm your subscription. I am
a working photographer, however, so I'm not always at the computer and
your patience is appreciated. That said, I do my best to get
accounts activated as quickly as possible once I know that manual
activation is needed.
When you subscribe, please enter your name exactly as it appears on your PayPal account (if you have one) or credit card (if paying without a Paypal account). Doing so can help to prevent problems with a subscription starting automatically. Name mismatches are the primary reason new subscriptions do not activate automatically.
Again, if the name you enter for your subscription does not match the name on your PayPal account (or credit card) there's a very good chance that your subscription won't start automatically.If you have questions, please e-mail me.
Log-In (Remember, you can also always log in by clicking the header at the top of this page).
Renew or check how long you have left on your subscription